The Effect of Work Productivity and Work Facilities on Employee Performance at the Secretariat of the Regional Financial and Asset Management Agency of Barito Selatan Regency, 2024

Authors

  • Muhammad Bukhari Muslim Mahridi* Department of Management, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Dahani Dahanai, Jl. Cut Nyak Dien No. 9A, Buntok, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Author
  • Yunita Pebrianti Department of Management, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Dahani Dahanai, Jl. Cut Nyak Dien No. 9A, Buntok, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Author
  • Mariatul Department of Management, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Dahani Dahanai, Jl. Cut Nyak Dien No. 9A, Buntok, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Author
  • Enjelina Aulia Putri Department of Management, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Dahani Dahanai, Jl. Cut Nyak Dien No. 9A, Buntok, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65336/WJAEL.2026.3802

Keywords:

Work Productivity, Work Facilities, Employee Performance, BPKAD Secretariat.

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effect of Work Productivity and Work Facilities on Employee Performance, partially. It seeks to determine how much influence Work Productivity and Work Facilities have on Employee Performance at the Secretariat of the Regional Financial and Asset Management Agency (BPKAD) of Barito Selatan Regency. This research uses a descriptive quantitative method. Primary and secondary data were used, collected through quota sampling and gathered via observation, interviews, documentation, and questionnaires. Instrument testing included validity and reliability tests, descriptive statistics and normality assessment, the initial PLS path model, convergent validity and internal consistency reliability, discriminant validity (cross loading), discriminant validity via the heterotrait-monotrait ratio (HTMT), and hypothesis testing using SmartPLS 4.0. Based on the hypothesis testing results, Work Productivity (X1) was found to have no significant effect on Employee Performance (Y), with a t-statistic of 0.562 < 1.68957 and a p-value of 0.574 > 0.05, indicating that the t-statistic is smaller than the t-table value; thus Ha is rejected and Ho is accepted. This means that Work Productivity (X1) partially has a negative and non-significant effect on Employee Performance (Y). The hypothesis testing further shows that Work Facilities (X2) have a significant effect on Employee Performance (Y), with a t-statistic of 2.044 > 1.68957 and a p-value of 0.041 < 0.05; thus Ha is accepted and Ho is rejected. This means that Work Facilities (X2) partially have a positive and significant effect on Employee Performance (Y).

 

References

1. Ambarwati, Y., & Suryani, N. (2014). Pengaruh Komunikasi Internal, Motivasi Kerja Dan Fasilitas Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Perangkat Desa Di Kecamatan Wonoboyo Kabupaten Temanggung. Economic Education Analysis Journal, 3(2), 299–306.

2. Andriani, Musseng, A., & Iqbal. (2020). Analisis Disiplin Pegawai Dan Produktivitas Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Direktorat Jenderal Bea Dan Cukai Sulawesi Bagian Selatan Di Makassar. Master of Management Journal, 1, 71–79.

3. Anuraga, G., Sulistiyawan, E., & Munadhiroh, S. (2017). Structural Equation Modeling – Partial Least Square Untuk Pemodelan Indeks Pembangunan Kesehatan Masyarakat (IPKM) Di Jawa Timur. Universitas.

4. Chasanah, I., & Rustiana, A. (2017). Pengaruh Kemampuan Kerja, Fasilitas Kerja, Dan Prinsip Prosedur Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Di Kantor Kecamatan Se Kabupaten Batang. Economic Education Analysis Journal, 6(2), 433–446.

5. Ela Elliyana, S. E. (2021). LEMBAGA KEUANGAN DAN PASAR MODA. Ahlimedia Book.

6. Fadilah, F., & Al Banin, Q. (2022). Pengaruh Pelatihan, Lingkungan Kerja, Dan Fasilitas Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Di Puskesmas Bantarkawung. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Dan Bisnis (JIMBis), 1(2). https://doi.org/10.24034/jimbis.v1i2.5362

7. Fajriansyah, Taufiq, I. M., Sasmita, H., Hamdat, A., & Singkeruang, F. T. W. A. (2022). Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja Dan Produktivitas Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah Daya Di Masa Covid-19. Jurnal Sains Manajemen Nitro, 1(2), 150–160. https://doi.org/10.56858/jsmn.v1i2.95

8. Haang, P., Ahkmad, F. A. P., & Hamid, E. (2020). Pengaruh Produktivitas Kerja dan Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai pada Koperasi Parodhana Arta Solution Bekasi. Al-Misbah, 1(1), 119–129.

9. Hage, A. A., & Damayanti, E. (2020). The Effect Of Work Discipline And Work Productivity Through Organizational Culture On Employee Performance In Samsung WTC Surabaya Apollo. IJESS International Journal of Education and Social Science, 1(2), 67–74. https://doi.org/10.56371/ijess.v1i2.29

10. Ilham, & Aqfir. (2022). Pengaruh Kemampuan, Disiplin Dan Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Aparatur Sipil Negara. Economics And Business Management Journal (EBMJ), 1(3), 169–179.

11. Manurung, E., Nura, E. T. P., Metia, T. A., et al. (2021). Pengaruh Fasilitas Kerja, Kedisiplinan Dan Pengawasan Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Dinas Perikanan Kota Tanjungbalai. JMB (Jurnal Manajemen Dan Bisnis), 3(1), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.30743/jmb.v3i1.3628

12. Marliana, R. R. (2019). Partial Least Square-Structural Equation Modeling Pada Hubungan Antara Tingkat Kepuasan Mahasiswa Dan Kualitas Google Classroom Berdasarkan Metode WebQual 4.0. Jurnal Matematika, Statistika Dan Komputasi, 16(2), 174. https://doi.org/10.20956/jmsk.v16i2.7851

13. Nisa, M., Sudarno, S., & Sugito, S. (2021). Moderating Structural Equation Modeling Dengan Partial Least Square Pada Pemodelan Penerimaan Dan Penggunaan Dompet Digital Di Kota Semarang. Jurnal Gaussian, 10(1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.14710/j.gauss.v10i1.30044

14. Rajab, M. (2021). Literature Review Factors Affecting Leadership: Quality of Work, Work Effectiveness and Work Communication. Dinasti International Journal of Economics, Finance & Accounting, 2(2), 151–159. https://doi.org/10.38035/dijefa.v2i2.1275

15. Rangkuti, A. E., Thasya, B., & Yanti, A. (2021). Pengaruh Fasilitas Kerja dan Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Pada Kantor Wilayah DJBC Sumatera Utara. Konferensi Nasional Sosial Dan Engineering Politeknik Negeri Medan 2021, 553–564.

16. Sayoto, B., & Winarto, H. (2018). Pengaruh Disiplin Kerja Dan Fasilitas Kerja Terhadap Produktivitas Kerja Karyawan MNCTV Bagian Produksi. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis Krisnadwipayana, 6(2), 2338–4794.

17. Sitompul, R. (2018). Pengaruh Fasilitas Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Di Dinas Pendidikan Kota Palangka Raya. JISPAR Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Pemerintahan, 7(1), 31–37.

18. Sri, W. (2018). Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Produktivitas Kerja Karyawan. Jurnal Manajemen, 3(2), 1–5.

19. Sugiyono, P. D. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

20. Suwarto, S. (2020). Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kinerja Pegawai. Eksis: Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 11(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.33087/eksis.v11i1.180

21. Widiana, M. E. (2020). Pengantar Manajemen (Y. Sutarso, Ed.). CV. Pena Persada.

22. Wijaksono, B. E., Sutapa, H., & Fajariah, N. (2022). Pengaruh Fasilitas Kerja Dan Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Perum Jasa Tirta I Wilayah Sub Dja II/I Kediri. Jurnal Publikasi Sistem Informasi Dan Manajemen Bisnis, 1(3), 89–105. https://doi.org/10.55606/jupsim.v1i3.659

23. Wijaya, C., & Manurung, O. (2021). Produktivitas Kerja: Analisis Faktor Budaya Organisasi, Kepemimpinan Spiritual, Sikap Kerja, dan Motivasi Kerja untuk Hasil Kerja Optimal (R. Hidayat, Ed.). Kencana.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-11

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

The Effect of Work Productivity and Work Facilities on Employee Performance at the Secretariat of the Regional Financial and Asset Management Agency of Barito Selatan Regency, 2024. (2026). World Journal of Arts, Education and Literature, 3(8), 7-13. https://doi.org/10.65336/WJAEL.2026.3802