RHYTHMIC SIGN LANGUAGE IN SPLIT-SCREEN BALINESE DANCE TUTORIALS: AN INCLUSIVE LEARNING MODEL FOR DEAF DANCERS

Authors

  • I Wayan Agus Eka Cahyadi* Institut Seni Indonesia Bali, Denpasar, Indonesia. Author
  • I Nyoman Larry Julianto Institut Seni Indonesia Bali, Denpasar, Indonesia Author
  • Vanesa Martida Institut Seni Indonesia Bali, Denpasar, Indonesia. Author
  • Gede Pasek Putra Adnyana Yasa Institut Seni Indonesia Bali, Denpasar, Indonesia. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65336/WJAEL.2026.31003

Keywords:

rhythmic sign language, split-screen, Balinese dance, inclusive dance learning, Deaf dancers, Larajiva Community

Abstract

The learning of traditional Balinese dance for Deaf persons with disabilities continues to face challenges in understanding rhythm, tempo, and movement synchronization because most dance instruction is delivered through auditory media. This study aims to analyze the development and implementation of split-screen Balinese dance tutorial videos that integrate rhythmic sign language as an inclusive dance learning model for Deaf dancers. The study employed a qualitative approach using a Design-Based Research (DBR) design within the Larajiva Community Bali. Data were collected through observation, semi-structured interviews, video documentation, and focus group discussions, and were analyzed using thematic analysis. The findings indicate that the instructional media developed consisted of two tutorial videos: Pendet Dance for female dancers and Baris Dance for male dancers. The split-screen design enabled learners to observe dance movement demonstrations on the left side of the screen and rhythmic sign language performed by the instructor on the right side simultaneously. Analysis of the sectional structures of Pendet Dance (Pepeson, Pengadeg, and Panyuwud/Pekaad) and Baris Dance (Pepeson, Pengawak, Pengecet, and Pekaad) revealed that rhythmic sign language functioned as a marker of beats, tempo changes, movement accents, and choreographic transitions synchronized with the gamelan accompaniment. The integration of dance movements, rhythmic sign language, and musical structure created a multimodal learning system that enhanced accessibility, rhythm comprehension, movement synchronization, and independent learning among Deaf dancers. This study proposes a culturally grounded model of inclusive Balinese dance pedagogy that can be applied in other arts communities and inclusive dance education settings.

 

References

1. Benjamin, A. (2020). Making an Entrance: Theory and Practice for Disabled and Non-Disabled Dancers. Routledge.

2. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. Sage Publications.

3. Cahyadi, I. W. A. E., Julianto, I. N. L., & Martida, V. (2026). Pelatihan pembuatan video grafis tutorial koreografi sebagai media instruksional tari inklusif bagi instruktur Komunitas Larajiva.

4. CAST. (2024). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines Version 3.0. CAST Publishing.

5. Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2023). E-Learning and the Science of Instruction (5th ed.). Wiley.

6. Collins, A., Rentschler, R., Williams, K., & Azmat, F. (2021). Exploring barriers to social inclusion for disabled people: Perspectives from the performing arts. Journal of Management & Organization, 27(1), 6–24.

7. https://www.nusabali.com/berita/230610/menari-tanpa-suara-isi-bali-buat-video-tutorial-untuk-bisu-tuli

8. Lidwell, W., Holden, K., & Butler, J. (2021). Universal Principles of Design (3rd ed.). Rockport Publishers.

9. Lowe, R., & Schnotz, W. (2014). Learning from Dynamic Visualization. Springer.

10. Mareza, L., Mumpuniarti, Suwarjo, Mustadi, A., & Dewi, D. S. E. (2025). Arts education for children with disabilities: A systematic literature review. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 15(1), 35–58.

11. Marschark, M., & Spencer, P. E. (2016). The Oxford Handbook of Deaf Studies in Learning and Cognition. Oxford University Press.

12. Mayer, R. E. (2021). Multimedia Learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

13. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

14. Reeves, T. C. (2006). Design research from a technology perspective. In J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational Design Research (pp. 52–66). Routledge.

15. UNESCO. (2023). Culture and Arts Education Framework. UNESCO Publishing.

16. UNESCO. (2025). Implementation Guidance for the UNESCO Framework for Culture and Arts Education. UNESCO Publishing.

17. UNESCO IITE. (2021a). Emerging Practices in Inclusive Digital Learning for Students with Disabilities. UNESCO Institute for Information Technologies in Education.

18. UNICEF Innocenti. (2025). Arts and Culture for Inclusion: A Systematic Review on Children with Disabilities. UNICEF Office of Research.

19. Valli, C. (2011). Linguistics of American Sign Language: An Introduction (5th ed.). Gallaudet University Press.

20. Whatley, S., Kalogera, F., & Holland, R. (2022). Inclusive Dance Practice and Research. Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-13

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

RHYTHMIC SIGN LANGUAGE IN SPLIT-SCREEN BALINESE DANCE TUTORIALS: AN INCLUSIVE LEARNING MODEL FOR DEAF DANCERS. (2026). World Journal of Arts, Education and Literature, 3(10), 16-26. https://doi.org/10.65336/WJAEL.2026.31003