ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENCES IN PERCEPTIONS OF CAMPAIGN FUND QUALITY BETWEEN POLITICAL PARTIES AND THE GENERAL ELECTION COMMISSION IN SOUTH BARITO REGENCY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65336/yj9tty44Keywords:
Difference Perception, Campaign Funds, Knowledge, Accountability, Ethical BehaviorAbstract
This study aimed to obtain information and empirical evidence of differences in perceptions of campaign funds quality between members of political parties and members of the electoral commission in South Barito Regency. The population in this study are Political Parties on DPRD and the Election Commission of South Barito Regency. The sample was selected using saturated sampling techniques by using all of the population to be sampled. The amount of members in Political Parties on DPRD was 25 people, members and staffs of Election Commissions was 25 people. Data was analyzed using SPSS 25 for windows. This research proves that there was a distinct of perception regarding the knowledge of campaign funds. The second test proves that there are different perceptions about the accountability of Campaign Funds. The third testing proves that there are different perceptions about the ethical conduct of Campaign Funds.
References
1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
2. Akili, R., & Achmad, W. (2023). The Role of Political Parties in the Implementation of Democratic General Elections in the Indonesian State Administration System. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i4.551
3. Bhanu, B., Jumiati, I., Aulia, M. S., Adriani, M. I., Nazhifa, A., & Almaida, S. S. (2024). GOVERNMENT PERFORMANCE ACCOUNTABILITY (Case Study of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights Banten). The World of Public Administration Journal. https://doi.org/10.37950/wpaj.v5i2.1647
4. Clark, A. (2023). The Public Funding of Election Administration: Evidence from a British General Election. Political Studies Review, 22, 313–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/14789299221148429
5. Eilstrup-Sangiovanni, M., & Hofmann, S. (2024). Accountability in densely institutionalized governance spaces. Global Policy. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13345
6. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.
7. Fernandez, M., Hoor, G. Ten, Van Lieshout, S., Rodriguez, S., Beidas, R., Parcel, G., Ruiter, R., Markham, C., & Kok, G. (2019). Implementation Mapping: Using Intervention Mapping to Develop Implementation Strategies. Frontiers in Public Health, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00158
8. Fritzsche, D., & Oz, E. (2007). Personal Values’ Influence on the Ethical Dimension of Decision Making. Journal of Business Ethics, 75, 335–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9256-5
9. Gilens, M., Patterson, S., & Haines, P. (2021). Campaign Finance Regulations and Public Policy. American Political Science Review, 115, 1074–1081. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055421000149
10. Goel, R., & Nelson, M. (2024). Election campaign finance bans and corruption: effectiveness across parliamentary and presidential democracies. Constitutional Political Economy, 36, 129–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-024-09447-y
11. Greiling, D., & Spraul, K. (2010). Accountability and the Challenges of Information Disclosure. Public Administration Quarterly, 34, 338. https://consensus.app/papers/accountability-and-the-challenges-of-information-greiling-spraul/298d90ab298f5d2c9839ad298a477a7a/
12. Griffin, R. W., & Ebert, R. J. (2004). Business. Pearson Educación.
13. Irlandi, R. (2025). Strengthening transparency of political party financial reports to prevent illegal fundraising. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v10i2.1218
14. Ismaili, M. (2024). The Public Budget’ Coverage of the Electoral Campaigns and Elections (2017-2024) and the Prevention of the Abuse of State Resources for Free and Fair Elections in Albania. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.56345/ijrdv11n121
15. Jacobs, S., Boon, J., Wonneberger, A., & Salomonsen, H. (2021). Exploring Media-Covered Accountability of Public Agencies. Administration & Society, 54, 575–604. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997211036353
16. Kenig, O., & Atmor, N. (2019). Candidate spending and success in Israel’s party primaries: How far does money go? Party Politics, 27, 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068819833348
17. Khamitov, Z., Knox, C., & Junusbekova, G. (2023). Corruption, public procurement and political instability in Kazakhstan. Central Asian Survey, 42(1), 89–108.
18. Köppl–Turyna, M. (2014). Campaign finance regulations and policy convergence: The role of interest groups and valence. European Journal of Political Economy, 33, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2013.11.001
19. Kotzian, P., Stöber, T., Weißenberger, B., & Hoos, F. (2021). Effective, but not all the time: Experimental evidence on the effectiveness of a code of ethics’ design. Business and Society Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.12231
20. Le, T., Onur, I., Sarwar, R., & Yalcin, E. (2024). Money in Politics: How Does It Affect Election Outcomes? SAGE Open, 14. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241279659
21. Mardiasmo, M. (2002). Elaborasi Reformasi Akuntansi Sektor Publik : Telaah Kritis terhadap Upaya Aktualisasi Kebutuhan Sistem Akuntansi Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah. 6. https://consensus.app/papers/elaborasi-reformasi-akuntansi-sektor-publik-telaah-mardiasmo/52f30c312f145b0cad2fc80e2ef24372/
22. Marpaung*, L. W., & Indrayani, L. (2024). The Urgency of Campaign Fund Transparency for Better Elections. JIM: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Sejarah. https://doi.org/10.24815/jimps.v9i2.30549
23. Martela, F., Hankonen, N., Ryan, R., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2021). Motivating voluntary compliance to behavioural restrictions: Self-determination theory–based checklist of principles for COVID-19 and other emergency communications. European Review of Social Psychology, 32, 305–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2020.1857082
24. Meckling, W. H., & Jensen, M. C. (1976). Theory of the Firm. Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure, 3(4), 305–360.
25. Nilsen, P. (2015). Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implementation Science : IS, 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0
26. Rabie, R., & Elliyana, E. (2019). Human capital and economic growth in Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Economic Studies, 4(01), 169–176.
27. Rismawati, R., Handayani, M., Elliyana, E., & Pahala, I. (2026). Sustainable Finance in the Digital Age: The Function of Embedded Finance in Eco-Friendly Investments. In Reshaping Financial Systems and Fostering Sustainability Through Embedded Finance (pp. 163–196). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
28. Sahoo, N. (2022). How Should India Fund its Democracy? Lessons from the Global Experiences. Ijpmonline. https://doi.org/10.26524/ijpm.1.5
29. Solihin, S. (2025). Development of Islamic Religious Education Teaching Materials Based on Local Wisdom. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v8-i7-14
30. Suhardi, G. (2003). Usaha perbankan dalam perspektif hukum. Kanisius.
31. Sule, B., Sambo, U., Mat, B., Sani, M., & Yahaya, M. A. (2022). Issues and regulations in party financing and electoral expenses in Nigeria (1999–2020). Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 40, 253–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589001.2022.2031917
32. Syamsuddin, Hartiwiningsih, & Rustamaji, M. (2024). Paradox of Criminal Provisions Formulation Regarding Reporting of Political Party Campaign Funds in the 2024 General Election. Journal of Ecohumanism. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i7.4347
33. Theresia Dwi Hastuti, T. (n.d.). COULD PERSONALITY, CHARACTERISTICS OF VIOLATIONS, AND PERCEPTIONS OF THE ORGANIZATIONAL ENVIRONMENT BE A FACTOR DRIVING THE WHISTLEBLOWING INTENTION? COULD PERSONALITY, CHARACTERISTICS OF VIOLATIONS, AND PERCEPTIONS OF THE ORGANIZATIONAL ENVIRONMENT BE A FACTOR DRIVING THE WHISTLEBLOWING INTENTION?
34. Virananda, I., Dartanto, T., & Wijaya, B. (2021). Does Money Matter for Electability? Lesson Learned From the 2014 Legislative Election in Indonesia. SAGE Open, 11. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211054492
