JOHN RAWLS ON JUSTICE AS FAIRNESS AND THE BRITISH SOUTHERN CAMEROON’S PROBLEM

Authors

  • Prof. Peter Takov (Ph.D) Dean of the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Catholic University of Cameroon,(CATUC), Bamenda Author
  • Dr. Berinyuy Frankline (Ph.D) Philosophy Department, Catholic University of Cameroon,(CATUC), Bamenda Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65336/

Keywords:

Justice as Fairness, John Rawls, British Southern Cameroons, Anglophone Crisis, Political Equality, Federalism, Social Contract.

Abstract

John Rawls’ theory of Justice as Fairness provides a powerful framework for evaluating political legitimacy, equality, and the protection of fundamental rights within society. Rawls argues that a just society is one in which social and political institutions are organized according to principles that free and rational individuals would choose behind a “veil of ignorance,” where no one knows their social status, ethnicity, wealth, or political position. His theory emphasizes equal basic liberties, fair equality of opportunity, and the arrangement of social and economic inequalities to benefit the least advantaged members of society.

The British Southern Cameroons problem presents a significant challenge to the realization of justice and fairness in Cameroon. Following the 1961 reunification between the former British Southern Cameroons and the Republic of Cameroon, many Anglophone Cameroonians have expressed concerns over political marginalization, cultural assimilation, unequal representation, and the erosion of the federal arrangements that initially guaranteed their autonomy. These grievances have fueled demands for greater political recognition, federalism, and, in some cases, outright independence.

From a Rawlsian perspective, the legitimacy of political institutions depends on their ability to ensure equal rights and opportunities for all citizens regardless of linguistic or cultural identity. The persistent complaints of exclusion and unequal treatment among Anglophone populations suggest a departure from Rawls’ principles of fairness and justice. If the original constitutional and political arrangements no longer guarantee equitable participation and protection of minority rights, Rawls would likely advocate institutional reforms designed through inclusive dialogue and public reason. Such reforms should seek to restore trust, protect cultural diversity, and create conditions under which all citizens can enjoy equal liberties and opportunities.

Furthermore, Rawls’ concept of the social contract implies that political arrangements must continuously reflect the consent and interests of those governed. Addressing the British Southern Cameroons issue therefore requires policies grounded in justice, mutual respect, and democratic participation. A Rawlsian solution would prioritize peaceful negotiations, constitutional guarantees, decentralization or federal restructuring where necessary, and the protection of fundamental human rights. Ultimately, Justice as Fairness offers a valuable normative framework for understanding and resolving the British Southern Cameroons problem by promoting equality, inclusion, and political legitimacy in a diverse society.

Keywords: ; ; ; ; ; ; 

References

1. ANTHONY NDI, (1950-1972): Southern West Cameroon Revisited Unveiling Inescapable Traps Vol. 1, Bamenda, Paul’s Press, 1950

2. BAYART, 1989, L’Etat au Cameroun, Presse de la Fondation National des Sciences Politiques, Paris

3. BONGFEN CHEM LANGEE(1976). “The Cameroon Plebiscites 1958-1961”: Reception and Strategies Ph.D Theses UBC, Vancouver,

4. D. EYOH (1998b). “Conflicting Narratives of Anglophone Protest and the Politics of Identity in Cameroon” Journal of Contemporary African Studies Vol. 16, No. 2,” 249-276.

5. NGAH CHRISTIAN,. The Guardian Post, No.0109, Yaounde, Monday 17-23, May 2004.

6. RAWLS, JOHN (1971). A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

7. RAWLS, JOHN (2001). Justice as fairness. Cambridge: The Belknap Press

8. PIET KONINGS et al., (1997), “The Anglophone Problem in Cameroon,” The Journal of Modern African Studies, 35, 2, 210.

9. ROBERT NOZICK,(1974.) Anarchy, State and Utopia, New York, Basic Books

10. ROBERT JOSEPH, (1977). Radical Nationalism in Cameroon: Social Organs of the UPC Rebellion, Oxford,

11. SAMUEL FREEMAN,(ed.)( 2000.) The Cambridge Companion to Rawls, Cambridge University Press, New York

12. SAMUEL FREEMAN,(ed.) (1999) Collected Papers, Havard University Press, Cambridge, MA

13. VERKIJIKA G. FANSO, “Anglophone and Francophone Nationalisms In Cameroon” in The Round Table (1999), 350 (281-296), 283.

14. VICTOR E. MUKETE, (2013). My Odyeesy: The Story of Cameroon Reunification With Authentic Letters of Key Players, Yaounde, Sopecam

Downloads

Published

2026-06-18

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

JOHN RAWLS ON JUSTICE AS FAIRNESS AND THE BRITISH SOUTHERN CAMEROON’S PROBLEM. (2026). World Journal of Arts, Education and Literature, 3(6), 8-15. https://doi.org/10.65336/