LEADERSHIP AGILITY AND DIGITAL DISRUPTION: A QUALITATIVE EXPLORATION OF ADAPTIVE LEADERSHIP

Authors

  • Mohdari* Management, STIE NASIONAL Banjarmasin. Author
  • Valentino Rahman Management, STIE Dahani Dahanai. Author
  • Willem Management, STIE Palangka Raya. Author

Keywords:

Leadership Agility, Digital Transformation, Adaptive Leadership, Innovation Management, Organizational Resilience.

Abstract

The rapid evolution of digital technology has fundamentally reshaped organizational landscapes, requiring leaders to develop leadership agility—the ability to swiftly adapt, think strategically, and drive innovation in response to dynamic changes. Traditional leadership models struggle to navigate the complexities of volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous (VUCA) environments, making leadership agility a critical competency in the digital era. This study employs a qualitative phenomenological approach to explore how leaders perceive and implement agility in decision-making, innovation management, and organizational adaptability. Semi-structured interviews with industry leaders provide insights into key enablers and barriers to agile leadership. Findings reveal that leaders who embrace leadership agility demonstrate adaptability in decision-making, effective integration of emerging technologies, and foster inclusive and learning-oriented cultures. Case studies from various organizations illustrate successful applications of agile leadership, leading to increased innovation, enhanced workforce productivity, and improved market competitiveness. However, barriers such as resistance to change, lack of digital literacy, and bureaucratic structures hinder agility adoption. This study underscores the need for structured leadership agility training programs and the integration of agility principles into corporate governance frameworks. Organizations that cultivate agile leadership will be better positioned to thrive in the digital economy. Future research should focus on strategies to accelerate the development of leadership agility across different industries.

 

References

1. Adana, S., Manuj, I., Herburger, M., Cevikparmak, S., Celik, H., & Uvet, H. (2024). Linking decentralization in decision-making to resilience outcomes: a supply chain orientation perspective. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 35(1), 256–280.

2. Aldoseri, A., Al-Khalifa, K. N., & Hamouda, A. M. (2024). AI-powered innovation in digital transformation: Key pillars and industry impact. Sustainability, 16(5), 1790.

3. Boppiniti, S. T. (2019). Machine learning for predictive analytics: Enhancing data-driven decision-making across industries. International Journal of Sustainable Development in Computing Science, 1(3).

4. Buonocore, F., Annosi, M. C., de Gennaro, D., & Riemma, F. (2024). Digital transformation and social change: Leadership strategies for responsible innovation. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 74, 101843.

5. Cartland, J., Green, M., Kamm, D., Halfer, D., Brisk, M. A., & Wheeler, D. (2022). Measuring psychological safety and local learning to enable high reliability organisational change. BMJ Open Quality, 11(4), e001757.

6. Čirčová, V., & Blštáková, J. (2023). Reskilling and Upskilling of Managers: People Management in the Digital Era. EDAMBA 2022: Conference Proceedings, 87–96.

7. Edmondson, A. C. (2018). The fearless organization: Creating psychological safety in the workplace for learning, innovation, and growth. John Wiley & Sons.

8. Gledson, B. (2022). Enhanced model of the innovation-decision process, for modular-technological-process innovations in construction. Construction Innovation, 22(4), 1085–1103.

9. Igunma, T. O., Adeleke, A. K., & Nwokediegwu, Z. S. (n.d.). Developing Nanometrology and non-destructive testing methods to ensure medical device manufacturing accuracy and safety.

10. Joiner, B., & Josephs, S. (2007). Leadership agility. Insight (American Society of Ophthalmic Registered Nurses), 33(3), 32–37.

11. Kraft, Ü. (2019). How to lead with digital media effectively? A literature-based analysis of media in a E-leadership context. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 8(4), 42–52.

12. Levina, I. (2016). By connection or by competition? Decentralization of decision-making and hiring strategies at Russian firms. Applied Econometrics, 43, 73–95.

13. Lund, S., Madgavkar, A., Mischke, J., & Remes, J. (2021). What’s next for consumers, workers, and companies in the post-COVID-19 recovery. McKinsey & Company, 2, 11.

14. Mahajan, D. (2024). Leadership decision-making in innovation management.

15. Maier, C. D., & Engberg, J. (2021). Harvard Business Review’s reframing of digital communication: From professional expertise to practical guidance. Journal of Pragmatics, 176, 186–197.

16. Malik, P., & Garg, P. (2020). Learning organization and work engagement: The mediating role of employee resilience. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(8), 1071–1094.

17. Miao, Q., & Nduneseokwu, C. (2025). Applications of Leadership Theories and Concepts in Environmental Leadership. In Environmental Leadership in a VUCA Era: An Interdisciplinary Handbook (pp. 237–275). Springer.

18. Neeley, T., & Leonardi, P. (2022). Developing a digital mindset. Harvard Business Review, 100(5–6), 50–55.

19. Pacheco-Cubillos, D. B., Boria-Reverter, J., & Gil-Lafuente, J. (2024). Transitioning to agile organizational structures: A contingency theory approach in the financial sector. Systems, 12(4), 142.

20. Pawar, S., & Dhumal, V. (2024). The role of technology in transforming leadership management practices. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 7(4), 2024066.

21. Peiró, J. M., & Martínez-Tur, V. (2022). ‘Digitalized’Competences. A crucial challenge beyond digital competences. Revista de Psicología Del Trabajo y de Las Organizaciones, 38(3), 189–199.

22. Richards, S. (2023). McKinsey & Company: People and Organizational Performance Strategic Analysis.

23. Temelkova, M. (2018). Skills for digital leadership-Prerequisite for developing high-tech economy. International Journal of Advanced Research in Management and Social Sciences, 7(12), 50–74.

24. Terlato, A. N. (2024). Management Modelsvis-À-Vis the Challenge of a VUCA Environment and Wicked Problems.

25. Unhelkar, B., & Gonsalves, T. (2020). Enhancing artificial intelligence decision making frameworks to support leadership during business disruptions. It Professional, 22(6), 59–66.

26. Verma, R., Bharti, U., & Tripathi, U. (2022). Digital Era and Its Impact On Leadership Transformation. Sachetas, 1(2), 36–41.

27. WOOLLEY, J. L. (2010). A decision process model to support timely organizational innovation. Handbook of Decision Making, 197.

28. Zam, E. Z., Amin, S., Johannes, J., & Rosita, S. (2025). Digital leadership and employee performance in the public sector organizations: An investigation of organizational learning, dynamic capability and digital capability as mediation. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, Accepted Articles.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-06

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

LEADERSHIP AGILITY AND DIGITAL DISRUPTION: A QUALITATIVE EXPLORATION OF ADAPTIVE LEADERSHIP. (2025). World Journal of Arts, Education and Literature, 2(3), 1-4. https://wasrpublication.com/index.php/wjael/article/view/81