INFLUENCE OF SPINE DEGENERATION IN THE CERVICAL DEPARTMENT ON THE NEUROLOGICAL STATUS IN PERSONS WHO HAVE SURVIVED COVID-19
Keywords:
Long COVID, pain syndromes, cervical spine degeneration, neurological disordersAbstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the problem of long-term consequences of the disease, in particular on the nervous system. More and more clinical observations indicate that patients who have had COVID-19 have persistent or progressive neurological disorders, especially in the presence of degenerative changes in the spine. Myalgias and arthralgias are characteristic manifestations of COVID-19 and are observed in 50–90% of patients in the acute period. During the convalescence period, prerequisites are formed for the chronicity of symptoms with the involvement of the autonomic nervous system, which is associated with degenerative-inflammatory changes in the musculoskeletal system, immune disorders and organic damage to all parts of the nervous system. Decompensation of existing vertebrogenic pathology is of particular importance.
The aim of this study is to assess the impact of cervical spine degeneration on the neurological status of people who have had COVID-19.
The study included 65 patients with upper body pain syndrome that arose, persisted, or worsened after the acute period of COVID-19; the control group consisted of 14 practically healthy individuals. Pain intensity was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS). All patients underwent computed tomography of the cervical spine with determination of the Pavlov–Torg index and morphometric-densometric assessment of vertebral body density. scan.
Pain syndrome was the leading complaint mainly in the form of cervicalgia, often combined with upper back pain and irradiation to the upper extremities. Headache, vestibular and autonomic disorders had reflex-vascular mechanisms of implementation. Signs of acquired cervical stenosing pathology with a maximum in the C6 segment were found in 75.4% of patients, accompanied by pronounced neurological symptoms.
Conclusions. The transferred COVID-19 acts as a trigger for decompensation of degenerative changes in the cervical spine with the formation of persistent pain and neurological syndromes. This necessitates a multi-level assessment of the patient's condition, individualized treatment and rehabilitation tactics, and dynamic neurological monitoring.
References
1. Wood H. Exploring the long-term neurological consequences of COVID-19. Nat Rev Neurol. 2025; 21:65. doi:10.1038/s41582-025-01056-z
2. Ellul MA, Benjamin L, Singh B, et al. Neurological associations of COVID-19. Lancet Neurol. 2020; 19(9):767-783. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30221-0
3. Taquet M, Geddes JR, Husain M, Luciano S, Harrison PJ. 6-month neurological and psychiatric outcomes in 236 379 survivors of COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Psychiatry. 2021; 8(5):416-427. doi:10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00084-5
4. Nalbandian A, Sehgal K, Gupta A, et al. Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome. Nat Med. 2021; 27(4):601-615. doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01283-z
5. Ceban F, Ling S, Lui LMW, et al. Fatigue and cognitive impairment in post-COVID-19 syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Behav Immun. 2022; 101:93-135. doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2021.12.020
6. Mina Yu. et al. Deep phenotyping of neurological post-covid complications caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection. Neurology-neuroimmunology-neuroinflammation. May 5, 2023. DOI: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000200097
7. Lahiri D, Ardila A. COVID-19 pandemic: A neurological perspective. Cureus. 2020; 29;12(4):e7889. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7889;
8. Javed A. Neurological associations of SARS-CoV-2 infection: A systematic review. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2021; 16. doi: 10.2174/1871527320666210216121211;
9. Bandeira IP, Schlindwein MAM, Breis LC, Peron JPS, Gonçalves MVM. Neurological complications of the COVID-19 pandemic: What have we got so far? Adv Exp Med Biol. 2021; 1321:21-31. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-59261-5_2
10. Weng LM, Su X, Wang XQ. Pain symptoms in patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19): A literature review. J Pain Res. 2021; 26;14:147-159. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S269206
11. Walitt B, Bartrum E. A clinical primer for the expected and potential post-COVID-19 syndromes. Pain Rep. 2021; 16;6(1):e887. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000887
12. Oronsky B, Larson C, Hammond TC, Oronsky A, Kesari S, Lybeck M, et al. A review of persistent post-COVID syndrome (PPCS). Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2021; 20:1-9. doi: 10.1007/s12016-021-08848-3
13. Marinangeli F, Giarratano A, Petrini F. Chronic pain and COVID-19: Pathophysiological, clinical and organizational issues. Minerva Anestesiol. 2020. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.20.15029-6
14. Kemp Н, Corner Е, Colvin L. Chronic pain after COVID-19: Implications for rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth. 2020; 125(4):436-440. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.05.021
15. Galal I, Mohamed Hussein A, Amin M, Saad MM, Zayan HEE, Abdelsayed MZ, et al. Determinants of persistent post-COVID-19 symptoms: Value of a novel COVID-19 symptom score. The Egyptian Journal of Bronchology. 2021; 15:10. doi: 10.1186/s43168-020-00049-4
16. Halpin S, McIvor C, Whyatt G, Adams A, Harvey O, McLean L, et al. Postdischarge symptoms and rehabilitation needs in survivors of COVID-19 infection: A cross-sectional evaluation. J Med Virol. 2021; 93(2):1013-1022. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26368
17. Jacobs L, Paleoudis E, Bari D, Nyirenda T, Friedman T, Gupta A, et al. Persistence of symptoms and quality of life at 35 days after hospitalization for COVID-19 infection. PLoS One. 2020;11;15(12):e0243882. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243882
18. Lopez-Leon S, Wegman-Ostrosky T, Perelman C, Sepulveda R, Rebolledo P, Cuapio A, et al. More than 50 long-term effects of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Res Sq. 2021:rs.3.rs-266574. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-266574/v1
19. Attal N, Martinez V, Bouhassira D. Potential for increased prevalence of neuropathic pain after the COVID-19 pandemic. Pain Rep. 2021; 6(1):e884. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000884
20. Li Y, Scherer N, Felix L, Kuper H. Prevalence of depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder in health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2021; 16(3):e0246454. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246454
21. Stoyanov ON. Neurovegetology of neuropathic pain, Textbook: Kyiv, 2015, 40 p (In Ukrainian).
22. Parisi S, Borrelli R, Bianchi S, Fusaro E. Viral arthritis and COVID-19. Lancet Rheumatol. 2020; 2(11):e655-e657. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(20)30348-9
23. Hypocalcemia in COVID-19: Prevalence, clinical significance and therapeutic implications / L. di Filippo, M. Doga, S. Frara, A. Giustina // Reviews in Endocrine & Metabolic Disorders. - 2022. - Vol. 23 (2). - P. 299‒308. - DOI: 10.1007/s11154-021-09655-z.
25. Vitamin D Deficiency and Outcome of COVID-19 Patients /A. Radujkovic, T. Hippchen, S. Tiwari-Heckler [et al.] // Nutrients. - 2020. - Vol. 12 (9). - Article ID: 2757. - DOI: 10.3390/nu12092757.
24. Serum calcium and Vitamin D levels: correlation with severity of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients in Royal Hospital, Oman / W. Osman, F. Al Fahdi, I. Al Salmi [et al.] // International Journal of Infectious Diseases. - 2021. - Vol. 107. - P. 153‒163. - DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.04.050.
25. COVID-19 and Vitamin D- a Systematic Review / T. Jordan, D. Siuka, N. K. Rotovnik, M. Pfeifer // ZdravstvenoVarstvo. - 2022. - Vol. 61(2). - P. 124‒132. - DOI: 10.2478/sjph-2022-0017.
26. Pavlov, H., Torg, J.S., Robie, B., & Jahre, C. (1987). Cervical spinal stenosis. Determination with vertebral body ratio method. Radiology, 164(3), 771–775
27. Andreeva, T., Stoyanov, O., Mirdjuraev, E., Chebotareva, G., Kalashnikov, V., Vastyanov, R., Dariy, V. Clinical and morphometric features in cervical spine pathology in humans and animals. Pain, joints, spine. 2024; 14(3): 147–154. https://doi.org/10.22141/pjs.14.3.2024.430
28 Andreyeva, T.O., Stoyanov, OM., Chebotaryova, G.M., Kalashnikov, V.I., Vastyanov, R.S., & Mashchenko, S.S. (2023). Densitometric correlates of degenerative-dystrophic processes in cervical vertebrae of humans and domestic animals. Regulatory Mechanisms in Biosystems, 14(3), 386–392. doi:10.15421/022357
29. Andreyeva, T.O., Stoyanov, O.M., Chebotaryova, G.M., Vastyanov, R.S., Kalashnikov, V. I., & Stoyanov, A. O. (2022). Comparative clinical and morphometric investigations of cervical stenosis of the spinal canal in humans and dogs. Regulatory Mechanisms in Biosystems, 13(3), 301–307. doi:10.15421/022239
30. Andreyeva TO., Stoyanov OM., Chebotaryova HM., Manicheva NV., Kokidko LA. Comparison of morphometric, densitometrical data in the examination of the cervical spine of mammals. The 6th International scientific and practical conference “Science and technology: problems, prospects and innovations” (March 16-18, 2023) CPN Publishing Group, Osaka, Japan. 2023. 13-15
31. Kryvenko V.I., Pakhomova S.P., Fedorova O.P., et al. Formalized assessment of the patient's condition using scales for major internal diseases: Manual. Zaporizhzhia: Zaporizhzhia State Medical University, 2015. 97 p. (In Ukrainian).
32. Savchenko, V. M., Kharchenko, H. D., Kerestei, V. V., Buriak, O. Y., Pohrebniak, Y. M. Methodological peculiarities of domain assessment of international classification of functioning, disability and health that is used in physical therapy, ergotherapy. Rehabilitation and Recreation. 2023; (14), 98–112. https://doi.org/10.32782/2522-1795.2023.14.11 (In Ukrainian).
33. Ivchenko G.I., Medvedev Yu.I., Mathematical Statistics: Textbook.: Book House. "LIBROCOM", 2020. 219 p.
34. Narkevich I.A., Zubov N.N., Kuvakin V.I. Statistics in biomedicine, pharmacy and pharmaceuticals. Manual.: KnoРus, 2019. 300 p.
35. Holck P. Cervikalcolumnas anatomi [Anatomy of the cervical spine]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2010 Jan 14;130(1):29-32. Norwegian. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.09.0296. PMID: 20094120
36. Hautier L., Weisbecker V., Sánchez-Villagra M.R. et.all. Skeletal development in sloths and the evolution of mammalian vertebral patterning // Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA. 2010; 107 (44):18903-18908. doi:10.1073/pnas.1010335107
37. Kaiser, J.T., Reddy, V., & Lugo-Pico, J.G. Anatomy, Head and Neck: Cervical Vertebrae. [Updated 2022 Oct 6]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK539734/
38. Bland, J.H.,& Boushey, D.R. Anatomy and physiology of the cervical spine. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1990; 20(1):1-20. doi: 10.1016/0049-0172(90)90090-3
39. Kyungmin Han, Soon Tae You, Ho Jin Lee, Il Sup Kim, Jae Taek Hong & Jae Hoon Sung Hounsfield unit measurement method and related factors that most appropriately reflect bone mineral density on cervical spine computed tomography. Skeletal Radiology. 2022; 51:1987–1993.
40. Ordway NR, Lu YM, Zhang X, et al. Correlation of cervical endplate strength with CT measured subchondral bone density. Eur Spine J. 2007; 16(12):2104–2109
41. Kandziora F, Pflugmacher R, Scholz M, et al. Comparison between sheep and human cervical spines: an anatomic, radiographic, bone mineral density, and biomechanical study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001; 26(9):1028–1037
42. Weishaupt D, Schweitzer ME, DiCuccio MN, et al. Relationships of cervical, thoracic, and lumbar bone mineral density by quantitative CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2001; 25(1):146–150
43. Yoganandan N, Pintar FA, Stemper BD, et al. Trabecular bone density of male human cervical and lumbar vertebrae. Bone. 2006; 39(2):336–344
44. Yoganandan N, Pintar FA, Stemper BD, et al. Bone mineral density of human female cervical and lumbar spines from quantitative computed tomography. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006; 31(1):73–76
