The Pragmatics of Misrepresentation: A Comparative Analysis of Select 2023 Campaign Speeches
Keywords:
Pragmatics, Political Discourse, Misrepresentation, Rhetoric, DemocracyAbstract
Election periods tends to offer critical opportunity for change to the better especially for countries that practice democracy as their governance choice. Nigeria, like many African countries, in the turn of the century, switched to this governance style. The 2023 general election was expected to be a critical turning point in the nation’s democratic journey with politicians employing persuasive language to influence public opinion especially during campaigns. Over time, by utilizing rhetoric, exaggeration, and unrealistic promises, politicians aimed to foster unwarranted hope among voters. And this reliance on misleading tactics poses a serious problem as it misinforms citizens and cultivates unsustainable expectations that erode faith in the democratic process over time. This study, relying on the survey descriptive design, examines the pragmatic nature of misrepresentation in political discourse through a comparative analysis of the speeches delivered by Peter Obi, Bola Tinubu, and Atiku Abubakar during the Nigerian 2023 general elections. Through the theorization of loaded language, the study investigates the linguistic choices, speech patterns, and rhetorical strategies employed by these prominent candidates to shape public perception in order to acquire or maintain power. The result shows an overreliance on rhetoric that inspires through ambitious vision rather than informs through practical reason. It also shows politicians to be prone to presenting themselves and solutions in a glorified and over simplified terms that makes governance to be unrealistically achievable. Overall, the research contributes to a better understanding on how language is manipulated in political campaigns and to empower citizens with the ability to critically evaluate politicians' messages.
References
1. Abati, Rueben. (2019). “Political Discourse in Nigeria.” Daily Trust, 4 Aug, p. 5.
2. Agbedo, C., and Oladoyinbo, F. (2017). "The Myth of Post-Truth Politics: Tackling the Epidemic of Lies in Nigerian Political Discourse." African Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 11(7), 382-390.
3. Alao, A. (2007). Propaganda and Censorship in Nigeria. London: Zed Books.
4. Alo, M. A. (2007). “Pragmatics of Nigerian English Political Advertising.” Papers in Pragmatics, 1(1), 11-29.
5. Ayres, I. (1992). Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate (Vol. 35). Oxford University Press.
6. Chait, Jonathan. (2016). Words that Distort Reality: Political Punditry and Exaggeration. Brookings Institution Press, 34–39.
7. Chiluwa, I. E. (2012). "Propagandistic Discourse in Political Campaigns of Selected Nigerian Politicians on Facebook." Journal of Pragmatics, 44(12), 1620-1636.
8. Chiluwa, I., & Odebunmi, A. (2016). “On Terrorist Attack and Bomb Explosion in Nigeria: Stance and Engagement in Conversations on Nairaland.com.” Multilingual Margins, 3(1), 56-86.
9. Chiluwa, I. (2012). Social media networks and the discourse of resistance: A sociolinguistic CDA of Biafra online discourses. Discourse & Society, 23(3), 217-244.
10. Ezeala-Harrison, F. (2010). “Deceptive Campaign Advertisements as a Threat to Quality Political Communication in Nigeria.” ACTA Universitatis Danubius. Communicatio, 2(2), 279-289.
11. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and text: Linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourse analysis. Discourse & society, 3(2), 193-217.
12. Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. Routledge.
13. Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. Psychology Press.
14. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. Syntax and semantics, 3, 43-58.
15. Asiru, H., & Babangida, I. (2007). Pragmatic study of political hate speeches in selected newspapers in Nigeria.” Nairobi Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(1), doi.org/10.58256.
16. Kamalu, I., & Iniworikabo, P. B. (2016). Metaphors in selected political speeches of Nigerian democratic presidents. California Linguistic Notes, 40(2), 71-84.
17. Imhanlahimi, E. O. (2018). “Populism and Political Clientelism in Nigeria.” Constellations (J), 25(1), 99-103.
18. Jega, A. (2015). "Voter Suppression through Misrepresentation and Intimidation: The Problem of Money Politics in Nigeria." Strategic Review for Southern Africa, 37(1), 93-111.
19. Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge university press.
20. Terna-Abah, M. N. (2017). A pragmatic analysis of inconsistencies in selected political discourses of the APC led federal government and its implications for the governed. Journal of African Foreign Affairs, 4(1-2), 121-139.
21. Mendelberg, T. (2001). The race card: Campaign strategy, implicit messages, and the norm of equality. Princeton University Press.
22. Mey, J. (2001). Pragmatics: An Introduction. 2nd ed., Wiley-Blackwell.
23. Nunberg, G. (2018). Loaded Buzzwords. The Language of Political Spin. First ed., University of Chicago Press, 35–39.
24. Nwagwu, W. (2013). “Political Rhetoric and the Manufacture of Consent in Nigeria.” The Journal of Pan African Studies, 6(6), 31-48.
25. Ogbondah, C. (2014). “Political Metaphors and Persuasive effects in Nigerian Campaign Discourse.” African Studies, 73(1), 30-45.
26. Ogundimu, F. (2016). Media and Democracy in Twenty-First Century Nigeria. Uppsala Universitet.
27. Oha, O. (1994). “The Semantics of Female Devaluation in Igbo Proverbs.” African Study Monographs, 15(2), 87-102.
28. Opeibi, T. (2009). “Discourse, Identity and the English Language in Nigeria.” World Englishes, 28(3), 281-296.
29. Osisanwo, A. (2012). Conversationalisation of Discourse in Tell and The News Representation of Nigerian General Election (Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 166-185). Working Papers: Journal of English Studies.
30. Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge UP.
31. Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition (Vol. 142). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32. Tannen, D. (1993). Framing in discourse. Oxford University Press.
33. Tannen, D. (1998). The Power of Talk: Who Gets Heard and Why. Nature's English, Random House, pp. 12–15.
34. Thurlow, C. and Jaworski, A. (2006). “Political Discourse and Intrinsic Manipulation through Language.” Discourse & Society, 17(3) 253–83.
35. Tindale, C. W. (2007). Fallacies and argument appraisal. Cambridge University Press.
36. Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & society, 4(2), 249-283.
37. Van Dijk, T. A. (2011). “Political Discourse and Ideology.” Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, edited by Teun A. Van Dijk, Sage, 379-407.
38. Walton, D. (2014). "Why Fallacies Appear to Be Better Arguments Than They Are." Informal Logic, 34(1) 1-23.
39. Wodak, R. (2014). Critical discourse analysis. In The Routledge companion to English studies (pp. 302-316). Routledge.
40. Wodak, R. (2015). The politics of fear: What right-wing populist discourses mean. Sage.
41. Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford university press.
